{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-109",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:f7d12d0e43ddf10cdbacea22a688363203483a076b0c9aa68a4b8e0c3b177ff5",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1996:109, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1996-109",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-109",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1996:109, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Preskriptionstiden i 12 kap. 61 § jordabalken beträffande andrahandshyresgästs fordringsanspråk mot förstahandshyresgästen har ansetts börja löpa vid den tidpunkt då andrahandshyresgästen lämnade lägenheten och inte vid en tidigare tidpunkt då förstahandshyresgästens hyresavtal med hyresvärden upphörde på grund av förlikning.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-109",
  "softwareVersion": "4eef235f36cee1da",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1996-109, RH 1996:109, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-109 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:53c71ebe94ea5852, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1996-109/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:f7d12d0e43ddf10cdbacea22a688363203483a076b0c9aa68a4b8e0c3b177ff5",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:f7d12d0e43ddf10cdbacea22a688363203483a076b0c9aa68a4b8e0c3b177ff5",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:09:35.912Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-109",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}