{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-104",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e5785a639eff5dccce43b3ca31f75dcaf66bf545352dd9f6b8457c8866d17250",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1996:104, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1996-104",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-104",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1996:104, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: I mål angående förlängning av hyresavtal har hovrätten funnit att en person som dömts till långvarigt frihetsstraff har behov av sin lägenhet under permissioner och därefter vid frigivandet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-104",
  "softwareVersion": "d4b5d93559bc8654",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1996-104, RH 1996:104, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-104 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:1e3c3e38744f7291, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1996-104/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e5785a639eff5dccce43b3ca31f75dcaf66bf545352dd9f6b8457c8866d17250",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e5785a639eff5dccce43b3ca31f75dcaf66bf545352dd9f6b8457c8866d17250",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:07:35.339Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-104",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}