{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1995-76",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:effb8dbadf235ed3b7e530e43f3c9beeb9e617855c5cf210e723c1601ba7b936",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1995:76, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1995-76",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1995-76",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1995:76, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Enbart ett påstående från åklagaren om att ett icke namngivet vittne, som av rädsla inte velat träda fram, har pekat ut någon som gärningsman har inte ansetts tillräckligt för att sannolika skäl för brott skall föreligga.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 1995."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1995-76",
  "softwareVersion": "47f8f66e1b592baa",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1995-76, RH 1995:76, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1995-76 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:531848f50406c8d0, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1995-76/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:effb8dbadf235ed3b7e530e43f3c9beeb9e617855c5cf210e723c1601ba7b936",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:effb8dbadf235ed3b7e530e43f3c9beeb9e617855c5cf210e723c1601ba7b936",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:55:40.685Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1995-76",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}