{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-33",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:7ba2b36b26f78cf328b96ea17f0a0d0b08f9a607cec77d10cb239444b53e1f7a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1994:33, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1994-33",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-33",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1994:33, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Att reglerna om villkorlig frigivning numera är fakultativa har ansetts innebära att en domstol inte med utgångspunkt från dessa regler kan ange den dag då en häktad tilltalad skall försättas på fri fot.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 1994."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-33",
  "softwareVersion": "2c16b54d45634f96",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1994-33, RH 1994:33, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-33 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:dae016742f559ef8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1994-33/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:7ba2b36b26f78cf328b96ea17f0a0d0b08f9a607cec77d10cb239444b53e1f7a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:7ba2b36b26f78cf328b96ea17f0a0d0b08f9a607cec77d10cb239444b53e1f7a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:05:25.310Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-33",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}