{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-114",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:f88322b0edd2d3cddfdbe5a53f06a01ccb5f7a5e5835d2cc7ad8298b56e62883",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1994:114, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1994-114",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-114",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1994:114, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Konsument, som har lämnat in en matta för tvättning vid ett tvätteri, har inte ansetts bevisskyldig för att skada som visat sig efter tvättningen har uppkommit på grund av att tvätteriet har hanterat mattan felaktigt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 1994."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-114",
  "softwareVersion": "21c3f84fa99400a9",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1994-114, RH 1994:114, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-114 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:cb9e70494c2c3ea7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1994-114/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:f88322b0edd2d3cddfdbe5a53f06a01ccb5f7a5e5835d2cc7ad8298b56e62883",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:f88322b0edd2d3cddfdbe5a53f06a01ccb5f7a5e5835d2cc7ad8298b56e62883",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:06:58.323Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-114",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}