{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-106",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:411809a762d7b1953e2d815c2baac432c58ccbe08f4596a3495b426883881c33",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1994:106, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1994-106",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-106",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1994:106, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ersättning till tolk har fastställts med avvikelse från gällande tolktaxa eftersom det ansetts försvarligt och önskvärt att tolken lagt ned ett förberedelsearbete på målet som går utöver vad som är brukligt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 1993."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-106",
  "softwareVersion": "14e130cc4a6331b4",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1994-106, RH 1994:106, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-106 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:846006876c41ee5a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1994-106/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:411809a762d7b1953e2d815c2baac432c58ccbe08f4596a3495b426883881c33",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:411809a762d7b1953e2d815c2baac432c58ccbe08f4596a3495b426883881c33",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:10:08.296Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1994-106",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}