{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-21",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:923c545036606b01efc975c832fd14ea46b635218765fc4351524afa054b405d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1993:21, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1993-21",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-21",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1993:21, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Skadeståndstalan mot en tilltalad som dömts för olovligt brukande av en lastbil har ogillats eftersom det inte förelegat adekvat kausalitet mellan brukandet och skadan och regeln om casus mixtus cum culpa inte ansetts tillämplig.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 1993."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-21",
  "softwareVersion": "af7e0f135f1b8d34",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1993-21, RH 1993:21, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-21 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:e677ca5c6e0bf3e4, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1993-21/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:923c545036606b01efc975c832fd14ea46b635218765fc4351524afa054b405d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:923c545036606b01efc975c832fd14ea46b635218765fc4351524afa054b405d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:49:50.942Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-21",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}