{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-154",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:00f5498a89827d968044c5642dbd0c9e333cf56ce91e970974297b128cc0d24a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1993:154, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1993-154",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-154",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1993:154, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Sedan käranden i stämningsansökan bl.a. yrkat jämkning av testamente för laglotts utfående utan att ange på vilket sätt jämkningen skulle ske, har ansökningen avvisats, då den ansetts så ofullständig att den inte utan väsentlig olägenhet kunnat läggas till grund för en rättegång.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 1993."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-154",
  "softwareVersion": "7144cb8731be667d",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1993-154, RH 1993:154, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-154 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:cf85024180c8167b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1993-154/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:00f5498a89827d968044c5642dbd0c9e333cf56ce91e970974297b128cc0d24a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:00f5498a89827d968044c5642dbd0c9e333cf56ce91e970974297b128cc0d24a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T13:04:56.018Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-154",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}