{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-140",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:537b83573ef8f69cef4a5032057c0fa45a6945e038d6c5a71efed88c28d55640",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1993:140, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1993-140",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-140",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1993:140, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ett s.k. bonnackord, dvs. en överenskommelse mellan kronofogdemyndigheten och gäldenären om att denne skall slippa att betala ett skuldbelopp som därvid anmäls för avskrivning, har inte ansetts hindra myndigheten från att genom införsel och utmätning hos gäldenären ta i anspråk medel som skall återbetalas.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1993."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-140",
  "softwareVersion": "2bd4fbf8aacf55fa",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1993-140, RH 1993:140, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-140 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:75218f0f45465cc8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1993-140/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:537b83573ef8f69cef4a5032057c0fa45a6945e038d6c5a71efed88c28d55640",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:537b83573ef8f69cef4a5032057c0fa45a6945e038d6c5a71efed88c28d55640",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-09-05T11:44:30.332Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-140",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}