{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-134",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0ad0ae9ae694a5306accfb6052f13bd9a3672840470020575b3622e54b096a35",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1993:134, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1993-134",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-134",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1993:134, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Servitutshavare, med rätt endast att nyttja en redan vid servitutets tillkomst befintlig utfartsväg, har, sedan skador uppstått på vägen, inte ansetts äga rätt att av skadevållaren kräva ersättning för en reparation av vägen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 1991."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-134",
  "softwareVersion": "6b9d434fa71618dd",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1993-134, RH 1993:134, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-134 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6bf344374db84885, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1993-134/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0ad0ae9ae694a5306accfb6052f13bd9a3672840470020575b3622e54b096a35",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0ad0ae9ae694a5306accfb6052f13bd9a3672840470020575b3622e54b096a35",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:12:45.383Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-134",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}