{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-129",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:25f10a81f0b161d3490e1af487daeccdce431635fbc1f5ffdb8a0432e135a79f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1993:129, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1993-129",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-129",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1993:129, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fråga om avvisande av talan vid överklagande av fastighetsbildningsmyndighets beslut till fastighetsdomstolen kan underlåtas trots att bestämt yrkande och grunder inte har angetts efter det att klaganden har förelagts att komplettera överklagandet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 1992."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-129",
  "softwareVersion": "69e2fd40533e8c93",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1993-129, RH 1993:129, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-129 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:21969cb66baad467, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1993-129/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:25f10a81f0b161d3490e1af487daeccdce431635fbc1f5ffdb8a0432e135a79f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:25f10a81f0b161d3490e1af487daeccdce431635fbc1f5ffdb8a0432e135a79f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:05:09.452Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-129",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}