{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-122",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:c16fa62168af2c5be4c9f7bd818189ef49ab0c321ea647281ceff0f5cd04c467",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1993:122, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1993-122",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-122",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1993:122, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När en kronofogdemyndighet hade förelagt en gäldenär att svara på en ansökan om betalningsföreläggande, har ansökningen ansetts upptagen av myndigheten med följd att den inte kunnat avvisas som bristfällig.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1993."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-122",
  "softwareVersion": "c1bb3a81a1b6f344",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1993-122, RH 1993:122, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-122 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:b0041d982e634d0a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1993-122/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:c16fa62168af2c5be4c9f7bd818189ef49ab0c321ea647281ceff0f5cd04c467",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-09-06T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:c16fa62168af2c5be4c9f7bd818189ef49ab0c321ea647281ceff0f5cd04c467",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-09-05T11:44:41.297Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1993-122",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}