{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-89",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:095e9cd98dbc1609a2372daa9ae69acc1380fc6cbfbc8b1f729dc8e4a2668c17",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2010 ref. 89, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2010-89",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-89",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2010 ref. 89, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Synnerliga skäl för avslutande av pensionssparande i förtid har ansetts föreligga då pensionsspararens ekonomiska situation föranlett allvarliga psykiska problem (I) men inte då en utbetalning av pensionsmedlen skulle leda till enbart en tillfällig och partiell förbättring av pensionsspararens ekonomiska situation (II).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2010. Tillämpar Inkomstskattelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-89",
  "softwareVersion": "cb3faffa2ff3f7a9",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2010-89, RÅ 2010 ref. 89, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-89 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:329c51c7dd6478ac, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2010-89/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:095e9cd98dbc1609a2372daa9ae69acc1380fc6cbfbc8b1f729dc8e4a2668c17",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:095e9cd98dbc1609a2372daa9ae69acc1380fc6cbfbc8b1f729dc8e4a2668c17",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:12:39.360Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-89",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}