{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-69",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:c0bd94a3c0c70490dc9565cfdf738bc397bee7918a6b1ee39c038c87768aea2b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2010 ref. 69, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2010-69",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-69",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2010 ref. 69, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En kommun har ansetts inte ha rätt att dra in beviljad ersättning för personlig assistans enligt lagen om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade på grund av att den enskilde rest utomlands med avsikt att vistas där i cirka sex månader.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2010."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-69",
  "softwareVersion": "ffe2379859957a02",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2010-69, RÅ 2010 ref. 69, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-69 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:742038e27f2527bb, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2010-69/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:c0bd94a3c0c70490dc9565cfdf738bc397bee7918a6b1ee39c038c87768aea2b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:c0bd94a3c0c70490dc9565cfdf738bc397bee7918a6b1ee39c038c87768aea2b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:08:08.452Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-69",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}