{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-90",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:207cbe886b9e9dcd774acdb1d436b5237f896d46e7d7842b5e51505c44c2cbf0",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2009 ref. 90, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2009-90",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-90",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2009 ref. 90, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Regeringens beslut om rätten att överklaga ett beslut om antagande av detaljplan har inte rättsprövats då regeringsbeslutet inte innefattat en prövning av den enskildes civila rättigheter eller skyldigheter enligt artikel 6.1 i Europakonventionen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2009."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-90",
  "softwareVersion": "777077256fbc9b1d",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2009-90, RÅ 2009 ref. 90, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-90 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:880cb4ee294f5766, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2009-90/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:207cbe886b9e9dcd774acdb1d436b5237f896d46e7d7842b5e51505c44c2cbf0",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:207cbe886b9e9dcd774acdb1d436b5237f896d46e7d7842b5e51505c44c2cbf0",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:15:01.236Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-90",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}