{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-73",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a0539f8e2ada89a95b9de6fc5a74fc40502fc778dc70ee826f3b619309213a53",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2009 ref. 73, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2009-73",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-73",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2009 ref. 73, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hel befrielse från skattetillägg har medgivits vid felaktig redovisning av mervärdesskatt bl.a. eftersom risken för skattebortfall framstått som synnerligen begränsad och en nedsättning till en fjärdedel inte ansetts tillräcklig för att beloppet (150 000 kr) skulle stå i rimlig proportion till den skattskyldiges försummelse.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2009."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-73",
  "softwareVersion": "c7ca6a4e3fc0ecf1",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2009-73, RÅ 2009 ref. 73, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-73 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:32d8fcf3a3cae33c, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2009-73/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a0539f8e2ada89a95b9de6fc5a74fc40502fc778dc70ee826f3b619309213a53",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a0539f8e2ada89a95b9de6fc5a74fc40502fc778dc70ee826f3b619309213a53",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:07:00.744Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-73",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}