{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-32",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:64d8d6d1597254dae45f90fe3991431eac483c80427667625a9be8f94124a67e",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2009 ref. 32, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2009-32",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-32",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2009 ref. 32, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En arbetstagare som har lämnat en tillsvidareanställning för en provanställning har inte ansetts ha lämnat sin anställning utan giltig anledning och grund för avstängning från rätt till arbetslöshetsersättning har därmed inte funnits.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2009."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-32",
  "softwareVersion": "4605ba445c967407",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2009-32, RÅ 2009 ref. 32, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-32 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:bd3e107b3a881266, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2009-32/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:64d8d6d1597254dae45f90fe3991431eac483c80427667625a9be8f94124a67e",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:64d8d6d1597254dae45f90fe3991431eac483c80427667625a9be8f94124a67e",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:14:40.304Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2009-32",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}