{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-89",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:be5d3905b6e5dbaf53fdc60b3d3b9aad592c9793d1ee208d079a36fb07b42c74",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2008 ref. 89, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2008-89",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-89",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2008 ref. 89, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Regeringsrätten har vid rättsprövning av regeringens beslut att fastställa järnvägsplan för del av Botniabanan funnit att frågan om järnvägens lokalisering blivit slutligt avgjord genom det tillåtlighetsbeslut om järnvägen som regeringen fattade den 12 juni 2003 (jfr RÅ 2004 ref. 108).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2008."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-89",
  "softwareVersion": "c410284f1014c446",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2008-89, RÅ 2008 ref. 89, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-89 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:ca715a5e936a9313, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2008-89/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:be5d3905b6e5dbaf53fdc60b3d3b9aad592c9793d1ee208d079a36fb07b42c74",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:be5d3905b6e5dbaf53fdc60b3d3b9aad592c9793d1ee208d079a36fb07b42c74",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:05:15.785Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-89",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}