{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-61",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9bec4e9e4917c866d88947efe3bca06fe552c23ff1d058de84e063f639368b77",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2008 ref. 61, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2008-61",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-61",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2008 ref. 61, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Befrielse har skett från hälften av skattetillägg som påförts på grund av för sent ingivna skattedeklarationer (I) och på grund av misskrivning vid upprättande av deklaration (II), eftersom de påförda skattetilläggen inte ansetts stå i rimlig proportion till den skattskyldiges underlåtenhet och felaktighetens art.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2008."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-61",
  "softwareVersion": "d3ec58e00a0789ec",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2008-61, RÅ 2008 ref. 61, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-61 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:04898351f34e9143, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2008-61/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9bec4e9e4917c866d88947efe3bca06fe552c23ff1d058de84e063f639368b77",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9bec4e9e4917c866d88947efe3bca06fe552c23ff1d058de84e063f639368b77",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:15:29.473Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2008-61",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}