{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-79",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:8eac044d187e1df5a2e9248a355c25757c92474f1f8fb6da66db384542961929",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2007 ref. 79, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2007-79",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-79",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2007 ref. 79, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Förutsättningar för beslut om betalningssäkring för Tullverkets fordran avseende mervärdesskatt vid import har inte ansetts föreligga med hänsyn till att Skatteverket funnit att den skattskyldige varit berättigad till avdrag för ingående skatt med motsvarande belopp.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2007."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-79",
  "softwareVersion": "ceecd01f9ce5da3a",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2007-79, RÅ 2007 ref. 79, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-79 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6a0636eb428bd0b7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2007-79/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:8eac044d187e1df5a2e9248a355c25757c92474f1f8fb6da66db384542961929",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:8eac044d187e1df5a2e9248a355c25757c92474f1f8fb6da66db384542961929",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:06:13.833Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-79",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}