{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-73",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:786642ff4649d7c4ba8212cbfd14dc1378ccebb10fb0fb257013e70725354b93",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2007 ref. 73, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2007-73",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-73",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2007 ref. 73, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Den treårsperiod under vilken gift person kan ha rätt till avdrag för ökade levnadskostnader vid dubbel bosättning skall räknas från den tidpunkt då sådan bosättning uppkommer, även om avdrag tidigare har medgetts enligt bestämmelserna för tillfälligt arbete.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2007. Tillämpar Inkomstskattelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-73",
  "softwareVersion": "8acadcf4bac5e35d",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2007-73, RÅ 2007 ref. 73, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-73 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3364f89fe91775bb, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2007-73/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:786642ff4649d7c4ba8212cbfd14dc1378ccebb10fb0fb257013e70725354b93",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:786642ff4649d7c4ba8212cbfd14dc1378ccebb10fb0fb257013e70725354b93",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:10:21.634Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-73",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}