{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-75",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:c738c5c6025cd109cad4505afbc343f1b6d51148a19181e1ffd5ee5e326303b4",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2006 ref. 75, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2006-75",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-75",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2006 ref. 75, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hinder har ansetts föreligga för registrering av ett varumärke som ansetts förväxlingsbart med en registrerad firma trots att det vid tiden för ansökan om registrering av firman fanns en tidigare ansökan om registrering av varumärket som gemenskapsvarumärke.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2006."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-75",
  "softwareVersion": "8a80add27d0e3f70",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2006-75, RÅ 2006 ref. 75, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-75 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:1737fb5e1ec872a4, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2006-75/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:c738c5c6025cd109cad4505afbc343f1b6d51148a19181e1ffd5ee5e326303b4",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:c738c5c6025cd109cad4505afbc343f1b6d51148a19181e1ffd5ee5e326303b4",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:04:38.338Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-75",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}