{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-59",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6a976888583d7a71b34f13c5f4ddd6ea3918e63b19f128eb0195e42dc9a3f6bf",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2006 ref. 59, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2006-59",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-59",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2006 ref. 59, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En skattskyldig som under mer än två år arbetat på samma ort utanför den ordinarie verksamhetsorten har inte medgetts avdrag för ökade levnadskostnader för de dagar då han rest till och från hemmet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2006. Tillämpar Inkomstskattelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-59",
  "softwareVersion": "33f799a0c2a0f03e",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2006-59, RÅ 2006 ref. 59, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-59 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3033dfd3607d1364, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2006-59/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6a976888583d7a71b34f13c5f4ddd6ea3918e63b19f128eb0195e42dc9a3f6bf",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6a976888583d7a71b34f13c5f4ddd6ea3918e63b19f128eb0195e42dc9a3f6bf",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:14:43.599Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-59",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}