{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-19",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a50cc479573b1c0195aba30d02adfede213a10468962cc4cc54672c6f3c3d7c8",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2006 ref. 19, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2006-19",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-19",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2006 ref. 19, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Aktiebolag, som omsätter mervärdesskattepliktiga varor och tjänster, har rätt till avdrag för mervärdesskatten på avgifter som erlagts för noteringen av bolagets aktier (I) och på förvärv av konsulttjänster avseende värdering av bolaget i samband med ett offentligt uppköpserbjudande (II).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2006."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-19",
  "softwareVersion": "370164c864e5cfd7",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2006-19, RÅ 2006 ref. 19, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-19 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:89651b80f35578f9, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2006-19/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a50cc479573b1c0195aba30d02adfede213a10468962cc4cc54672c6f3c3d7c8",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a50cc479573b1c0195aba30d02adfede213a10468962cc4cc54672c6f3c3d7c8",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:15:37.773Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2006-19",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}