{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-54",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:2c80fdbd22c13b3f6b88b124717a9672b91a26e969717d5142c64f977a2e1665",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2005 ref. 54, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2005-54",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-54",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2005 ref. 54, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Rättsprövning.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Trots att ett regeringsbeslut om avslag på en ansökan om tillstånd att anordna vadhållning ansetts innehålla en missvisande och ofullständig motivering har beslutet inte upphävts eftersom utgången stred varken mot lotterilagstiftningen eller mot EG-rätten såsom denna utvecklats i EG-domstolens praxis.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2005."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-54",
  "softwareVersion": "252d6f46ad71979c",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2005-54, RÅ 2005 ref. 54, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-54 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a7efe5a81ba56c64, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2005-54/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:2c80fdbd22c13b3f6b88b124717a9672b91a26e969717d5142c64f977a2e1665",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:2c80fdbd22c13b3f6b88b124717a9672b91a26e969717d5142c64f977a2e1665",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:16:01.317Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-54",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}