{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-49",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b5499264171e6fc9e33635b4c7b7b775483792f8c947df9551b58162ff568189",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2005 ref. 49, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2005-49",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-49",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2005 ref. 49, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Periodisering av ersättning som utbetalats till ett bolag dels som skadestånd för avtalsbrott, dels för åtagande att inte bedriva med annat bolag konkurrerande verksamhet har inte ansetts förenligt med god redovisningssed.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2005."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-49",
  "softwareVersion": "539924bb3be4d58c",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2005-49, RÅ 2005 ref. 49, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-49 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3cbfe7b699ccfcb2, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2005-49/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b5499264171e6fc9e33635b4c7b7b775483792f8c947df9551b58162ff568189",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b5499264171e6fc9e33635b4c7b7b775483792f8c947df9551b58162ff568189",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:05:10.899Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-49",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}