{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-36",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:50e8482ec5250f5a3ef5a5a542652c59335fa78f7d31982307bd98f2e585c742",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2005 ref. 36, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2005-36",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-36",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2005 ref. 36, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Rättsprövning.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: En ägare till en fastighet som direkt gränsar till den fastighet som ett bygglov avser har rätt att överklaga bygglovsbeslutet oavsett avståndet mellan bygglovsobjektet och ägarens fastighet eller bostad.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2005."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-36",
  "softwareVersion": "9473c8d5d6d3ed22",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2005-36, RÅ 2005 ref. 36, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-36 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3ba49ef7b44ea261, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2005-36/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:50e8482ec5250f5a3ef5a5a542652c59335fa78f7d31982307bd98f2e585c742",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:50e8482ec5250f5a3ef5a5a542652c59335fa78f7d31982307bd98f2e585c742",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:07:27.513Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-36",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}