{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-87",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6d39dc4edf6c7d6f3716e93ae46a8ee5e6f92ace335ee305f821a93991d54f95",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2004 ref. 87, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2004-87",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-87",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2004 ref. 87, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Förhandsbesked angående inkomstskatt.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ett aktiebolag som innehar 90,1 procent av aktierna i ett annat aktiebolag har vid tillämpning av reglerna om koncernbidrag ansetts som moderföretag till detta utan hinder av att avtal ingåtts med den andre delägaren om ekonomisk likställdhet dem emellan beträffande det gemensamt ägda bolaget.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2004. Tillämpar Inkomstskattelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-87",
  "softwareVersion": "3ba4e8eb8bce8ddd",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2004-87, RÅ 2004 ref. 87, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-87 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:88ba183387b6b819, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2004-87/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6d39dc4edf6c7d6f3716e93ae46a8ee5e6f92ace335ee305f821a93991d54f95",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6d39dc4edf6c7d6f3716e93ae46a8ee5e6f92ace335ee305f821a93991d54f95",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:07:37.653Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-87",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}