{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-85",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:d0624c0bf76951a88b8ead81f86885a656822e436ddd389fe16a0100078d120a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2004 ref. 85, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2004-85",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-85",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2004 ref. 85, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ersättning för skolavgifter till person som beviljats skattelättnad som s.k. utländsk expert har inte undantagits från beskattning då ersättningen avsett utgifter för barnens fortsatta skolgång på hemorten och således inte föranletts av vistelsen i Sverige.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2004. Tillämpar Inkomstskattelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-85",
  "softwareVersion": "7f64886a1d07e008",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2004-85, RÅ 2004 ref. 85, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-85 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:21d4c3a5d14848a1, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2004-85/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:d0624c0bf76951a88b8ead81f86885a656822e436ddd389fe16a0100078d120a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:d0624c0bf76951a88b8ead81f86885a656822e436ddd389fe16a0100078d120a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:03:59.209Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-85",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}