{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-78",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:52f92477d34e79af73854146b6f063355a05af695b482524363880d9e1c578cc",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2004 ref. 78, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2004-78",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-78",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2004 ref. 78, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ett beslut om dispens från kravet på ligghall för utegångsdjur har inte kunnat återkallas till nackdel för enskild då det inte förelegat tvingande säkerhetsskäl såsom fara för djurens liv eller hälsa.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2004."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-78",
  "softwareVersion": "ab0d5bb2b851f06e",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2004-78, RÅ 2004 ref. 78, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-78 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a669c91477ac1a78, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2004-78/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:52f92477d34e79af73854146b6f063355a05af695b482524363880d9e1c578cc",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:52f92477d34e79af73854146b6f063355a05af695b482524363880d9e1c578cc",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:05:51.122Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-78",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}