{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-73",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e8b50f40a40b8d86b15f8f9316beecffc02b60ec064e7a115d21cd139d669596",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2004 ref. 73, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2004-73",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-73",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2004 ref. 73, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En sökande av arbetslöshetsersättning har inte haft godtagbart skäl att avvisa ett erbjudet arbete av den anledningen att han ansett lagen om anställningsskydd berättiga honom till en annan anställningsform än vad det erbjudna arbetet innefattade.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2004."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-73",
  "softwareVersion": "b2a481744b5e9e58",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2004-73, RÅ 2004 ref. 73, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-73 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:edf54ee401a4c2b2, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2004-73/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e8b50f40a40b8d86b15f8f9316beecffc02b60ec064e7a115d21cd139d669596",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e8b50f40a40b8d86b15f8f9316beecffc02b60ec064e7a115d21cd139d669596",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:03:41.778Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-73",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}