{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-70",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1db42f7a98e9242be71c65a485a0b2cfc4bc592023277c918ca80e488bfecce9",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2004 ref. 70, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2004-70",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-70",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2004 ref. 70, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ett landstings beslut att en patientavgift vid läkarbesök skall inkludera eventuell provtagning medan viss avgift tas ut för provtagning utan samband med läkarbesök har inte ansetts strida mot den kommunala likställighetsprincipen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2004."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-70",
  "softwareVersion": "115f49f0dc3d1584",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2004-70, RÅ 2004 ref. 70, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-70 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a837ae0f817ea105, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2004-70/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1db42f7a98e9242be71c65a485a0b2cfc4bc592023277c918ca80e488bfecce9",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1db42f7a98e9242be71c65a485a0b2cfc4bc592023277c918ca80e488bfecce9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:04:55.941Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-70",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}