{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-11",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0ccc9c78555ce4c813d39fc0ca4ffe2f4a391854bc142021da4096936ea6717b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2004 ref. 11, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2004-11",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-11",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2004 ref. 11, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Inkomsttaxering 1999.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Grund för att påföra skattetillägg har ansetts föreligga då ett aktiebolag yrkat avdrag för nedskrivning av anläggningstillgångar och de lämnade uppgifterna inte motsade att bolaget hade rätt till sådant avdrag.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2004."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-11",
  "softwareVersion": "21ee1755f75b7556",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2004-11, RÅ 2004 ref. 11, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-11 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:dfbc5c4a530fbe4a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2004-11/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0ccc9c78555ce4c813d39fc0ca4ffe2f4a391854bc142021da4096936ea6717b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0ccc9c78555ce4c813d39fc0ca4ffe2f4a391854bc142021da4096936ea6717b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:11:21.469Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2004-11",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}