{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-92",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:2f16e4ca1845cdc79ac063b41b8bba96f15244798638935f728efbe65a689992",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2003 ref. 92, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2003-92",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-92",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2003 ref. 92, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Inkomsttaxering 1994.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Bestämmelserna i 4 § lagen mot skatteflykt om att en framställning om tillämpning av lagen skall göras hos länsrätt inom en viss tidsfrist har inte ansetts hindra att lagen får åberopas som en ny alternativ rättslig grund för ett yrkande i en pågående process i kammarrätt efter det att den angivna tidsfristen gått ut.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2003."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-92",
  "softwareVersion": "4993d6b013c63630",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2003-92, RÅ 2003 ref. 92, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-92 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:58ede371d2c8f364, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2003-92/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:2f16e4ca1845cdc79ac063b41b8bba96f15244798638935f728efbe65a689992",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:2f16e4ca1845cdc79ac063b41b8bba96f15244798638935f728efbe65a689992",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:11:17.038Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-92",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}