{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-38",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6bc9b27f4251df68f5a21b1af4d124e8ae08438623d9a5f62ac7fcf83ebf4c94",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2003 ref. 38, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2003-38",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-38",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2003 ref. 38, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Felaktig tillämpning av övergångsbestämmelser rörande beskattningen av kapitalinkomst avseende tilläggsköpeskilling vid försäljning av aktier har inte ansetts kunna tillskrivas sådant med felräkning eller misskrivning jämförbart uppenbart förbiseende som utgör grund för eftertaxering.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2003."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-38",
  "softwareVersion": "17ce918941506530",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2003-38, RÅ 2003 ref. 38, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-38 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:bdde74e2d9b8d36b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2003-38/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6bc9b27f4251df68f5a21b1af4d124e8ae08438623d9a5f62ac7fcf83ebf4c94",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6bc9b27f4251df68f5a21b1af4d124e8ae08438623d9a5f62ac7fcf83ebf4c94",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:07:34.738Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2003-38",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}