{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-91",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:4d83db7c6f8b7202f6e319c09dedda061ece2a644e65d7bcb60c18eef05382e1",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2002 ref. 91, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2002-91",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-91",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2002 ref. 91, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Laglighetsprövning enligt kommunallagen.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Rätten till kostnadsfri skolskjuts för grundskoleelev, som enligt ett fast system växelvis bor hos föräldrar med gemensam vårdnad och som därför har två likvärdiga hem, har ansetts omfatta resor till och från båda hemmen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2002."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-91",
  "softwareVersion": "cb2cd84a96f5a9fe",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2002-91, RÅ 2002 ref. 91, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-91 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:99c76042aa2457c3, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2002-91/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:4d83db7c6f8b7202f6e319c09dedda061ece2a644e65d7bcb60c18eef05382e1",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:4d83db7c6f8b7202f6e319c09dedda061ece2a644e65d7bcb60c18eef05382e1",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:57:36.810Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-91",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}