{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-87",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b5977110a2dc853675d1b2e4a533b9d55ce4127130dd456455ab45f9f1cc7116",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2002 ref. 87, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2002-87",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-87",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2002 ref. 87, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Förhandsbesked angående inkomstskatt.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hinder har inte ansetts föreligga att medge ett aktiebolag avdrag för kapitalförlust (realisationsförlust) som uppkommit vid upplösning av ett handelsbolag vid vilken aktiebolaget förvärvar handelsbolagets egendom till underpris.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2002. Tillämpar Inkomstskattelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-87",
  "softwareVersion": "04da5f207c0e4370",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2002-87, RÅ 2002 ref. 87, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-87 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:54d538ead57f8828, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2002-87/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b5977110a2dc853675d1b2e4a533b9d55ce4127130dd456455ab45f9f1cc7116",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b5977110a2dc853675d1b2e4a533b9d55ce4127130dd456455ab45f9f1cc7116",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:01:06.552Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-87",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}