{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-63",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1f7432b2c6f3ac10cabb60454bfecdb784fa72e17c781a7d2fb011ae79ae951d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2002 ref. 63, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2002-63",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-63",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2002 ref. 63, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En basstation för mobiltelefoni, bestående av en 36 m hög mast och två teknikbodar, som skall placeras inom ett planområde som har betecknats som parkmark har inte ansetts som en sådan byggnadsåtgärd som kan ses som en mindre avvikelse från planen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2002."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-63",
  "softwareVersion": "45db051261fec6b4",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2002-63, RÅ 2002 ref. 63, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-63 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:1bb2bec889d1a3f6, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2002-63/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1f7432b2c6f3ac10cabb60454bfecdb784fa72e17c781a7d2fb011ae79ae951d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1f7432b2c6f3ac10cabb60454bfecdb784fa72e17c781a7d2fb011ae79ae951d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:01:31.875Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-63",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}