{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-5",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:62f686a17ea82ccf32dbd437bb4ed379650ecf85682d7f8f0cca0df83ac8024c",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2002 ref. 5, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2002-5",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-5",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2002 ref. 5, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Den som enligt den upphandlande enhetens beslut antagits som leverantör har inte ansetts ha rätt att överklaga en därefter meddelad dom av länsrätten av innebörd att upphandlingen får avslutas först sedan viss rättelse skett.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2002."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-5",
  "softwareVersion": "3aa33a3aff6d8be3",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2002-5, RÅ 2002 ref. 5, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-5 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:55f83f2278de8272, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2002-5/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:62f686a17ea82ccf32dbd437bb4ed379650ecf85682d7f8f0cca0df83ac8024c",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:62f686a17ea82ccf32dbd437bb4ed379650ecf85682d7f8f0cca0df83ac8024c",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:05:04.204Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-5",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}