{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-42",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:831f37e44d75b0cf3959c9ed606cbef2e8449b5bdbb5f4dc4c1379d2cf07f35f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2002 ref. 42, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2002-42",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-42",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2002 ref. 42, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ett uthyrningsföretag betingar sig utöver hyra en särskild premie att betalas löpande för att efter hyrestidens utgång friskriva hyrestagaren från ansvar för reparationer av den då återlämnade egendomen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2002. Tillämpar Inkomstskattelagen."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-42",
  "softwareVersion": "4c32389209832924",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2002-42, RÅ 2002 ref. 42, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-42 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:39c59ae941ef1b03, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2002-42/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:831f37e44d75b0cf3959c9ed606cbef2e8449b5bdbb5f4dc4c1379d2cf07f35f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:831f37e44d75b0cf3959c9ed606cbef2e8449b5bdbb5f4dc4c1379d2cf07f35f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:02:40.376Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-42",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}