{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-29",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a601c0551011b61d56c32ecdbca8ec8dcf30c3e82552d942baecac0bb1a37711",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2002 ref. 29, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2002-29",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-29",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2002 ref. 29, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Anteckningar på ett delgivningskvitto har ansetts utgöra ett överklagande av det avgörande som delgivningen avsåg, när det av anteckningarna framgick att adressaten var missnöjd med avgörandets innebörd.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2002."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-29",
  "softwareVersion": "6edfa70f4c87c317",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2002-29, RÅ 2002 ref. 29, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-29 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f854189bd5dced13, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2002-29/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a601c0551011b61d56c32ecdbca8ec8dcf30c3e82552d942baecac0bb1a37711",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a601c0551011b61d56c32ecdbca8ec8dcf30c3e82552d942baecac0bb1a37711",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:04:55.833Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-29",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}