{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-28",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:30d504e18b31223002a5c674344e7878efe3c3628fef63fd5eefa9322fe08c83",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2002 ref. 28, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2002-28",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-28",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2002 ref. 28, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: I protokoll från sammanträde med riksbanksdirektionen intagen uppgift om den ram inom vilken rätten att genomföra valutainterventioner delegerats har ansetts vara av sådan art att det kan antas att syftet med beslutade eller förutsedda åtgärder inom det valutapolitiska området motverkas om uppgiften röjs.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2002."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-28",
  "softwareVersion": "1b57d3cf227457c9",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2002-28, RÅ 2002 ref. 28, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-28 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:0054baa62275d26d, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2002-28/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:30d504e18b31223002a5c674344e7878efe3c3628fef63fd5eefa9322fe08c83",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:30d504e18b31223002a5c674344e7878efe3c3628fef63fd5eefa9322fe08c83",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:04:25.659Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-28",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}