{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-115",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b6010e18c69561f72d7988b9029261ea662745a066f7b80cb101a36577170d13",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2002 ref. 115, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2002-115",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-115",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2002 ref. 115, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fördelningen av resultat i handelsbolag har frångåtts vid taxeringen då den framstod som orimlig och väsentligen betingad av skatteskäl (I) men godtagits då den inte kunde antas ha tillkommit för att uppnå skattefördelar (II).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2002."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-115",
  "softwareVersion": "d04e8b7e407e7416",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2002-115, RÅ 2002 ref. 115, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-115 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:fb214fede2eb186a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2002-115/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b6010e18c69561f72d7988b9029261ea662745a066f7b80cb101a36577170d13",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b6010e18c69561f72d7988b9029261ea662745a066f7b80cb101a36577170d13",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:55:45.896Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2002-115",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}