{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-3",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b8f66fb5ae47df5f656fa6d32aa89446e21564608ff087ddec17c9d4ebe35022",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2001 ref. 3, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2001-3",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-3",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2001 ref. 3, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En patient, som genomgår rättspsykiatrisk vård, har ansetts ha rätt att föra talan mot ett beslut varigenom länsrätten avslagit en ansökan av chefsöverläkaren om delegation till denne av rätten att besluta om permission för patienten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2001."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-3",
  "softwareVersion": "e14fa3a26a767a22",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2001-3, RÅ 2001 ref. 3, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-3 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:c66a5adbfb77599f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2001-3/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b8f66fb5ae47df5f656fa6d32aa89446e21564608ff087ddec17c9d4ebe35022",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b8f66fb5ae47df5f656fa6d32aa89446e21564608ff087ddec17c9d4ebe35022",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:01:19.140Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-3",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}