{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-27",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1fe0bfbd45f97591116f9f70008af39321f292a7cbe3f535eebff77410153002",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 2001 ref. 27, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-2001-27",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-27",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 2001 ref. 27, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Bestämmelserna i 14 kap. 5 § sekretesslagen (1980:100) har ansetts tillämpliga då en brottsanmälan mot en person lett till en omfattande s.k. förutredning och personen ifråga sedermera begärt att få ut uppgifter ur den avslutade utredningen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 2001."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-27",
  "softwareVersion": "ba5170f385b5b788",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-2001-27, RÅ 2001 ref. 27, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-27 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d707011065c32496, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2001-27/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1fe0bfbd45f97591116f9f70008af39321f292a7cbe3f535eebff77410153002",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1fe0bfbd45f97591116f9f70008af39321f292a7cbe3f535eebff77410153002",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:57:14.526Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2001-27",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}