{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-51",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6a5c6c8253c5bf9295af4213db3ee247879e4ccaee11a00d4443a3f8856b01a7",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 1999 ref. 51, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-1999-51",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-51",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 1999 ref. 51, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Socialförsäkringsnämndens beslut i ett ärende om livränta har ansetts kunna överklagas trots att något beslutsmeddelande som återgav nämndens beslut inte tillställts den klagande och beslut om det belopp varmed livräntan skulle utgå ännu inte fattats.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 1999."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-51",
  "softwareVersion": "1574905af126acc7",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-1999-51, RÅ 1999 ref. 51, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-51 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:01776f7e0bc38456, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1999-51/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6a5c6c8253c5bf9295af4213db3ee247879e4ccaee11a00d4443a3f8856b01a7",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6a5c6c8253c5bf9295af4213db3ee247879e4ccaee11a00d4443a3f8856b01a7",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:12:32.469Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-51",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}