{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-32",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:033089065e3f033378cc4455030561b318b8476e0db9143ffe3df1928387b406",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 1999 ref. 32, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-1999-32",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-32",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 1999 ref. 32, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Inkomsttaxering 1991.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Företag som tillhandahåller säkerhetsbrickor avsedda att underlätta återställande till kunderna av borttappade nycklar har ansetts ha rätt att uppskjuta intäktsföringen av fakturerade årsavgifter till den del de belöper sig på ett senare beskattningsår.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 1999."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-32",
  "softwareVersion": "e929401f30fb5a01",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-1999-32, RÅ 1999 ref. 32, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-32 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:c37c6e2f03328e13, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1999-32/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:033089065e3f033378cc4455030561b318b8476e0db9143ffe3df1928387b406",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:033089065e3f033378cc4455030561b318b8476e0db9143ffe3df1928387b406",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:18:03.295Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1999-32",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}