{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1998-17",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:2a8ef1b51319727834fbc65aa1c28d7e9d0628d683c9ee891b77a9b2a80b8549",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RÅ 1998 ref. 17, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-ra-1998-17",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1998-17",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RÅ 1998 ref. 17, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Bygglov har därför inte medgetts för åtgärderna.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: En byggnad med känsligt läge inom ett från kulturhistorisk synpunkt särskilt värdefullt bebyggelseområde har ansetts bli förvanskad, om den försågs med en takkupa (I) respektive två takfönster (II).",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 1998."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1998-17",
  "softwareVersion": "917f7591620863a2",
  "citation": "avgorande-ra-1998-17, RÅ 1998 ref. 17, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1998-17 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:4e76605c81e5d1d6, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1998-17/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:2a8ef1b51319727834fbc65aa1c28d7e9d0628d683c9ee891b77a9b2a80b8549",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:2a8ef1b51319727834fbc65aa1c28d7e9d0628d683c9ee891b77a9b2a80b8549",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:14:33.703Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1998-17",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}