{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-47","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-47)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-26","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:64b2d8","proof":"sha256:f896e1de662c4849eb48ad58fb3f836debfca04482b55da15478f20a60d76c32","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"RÅ 1997 ref. 47, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-ra-1997-47","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-47","inLanguage":"sv","about":"RÅ 1997 ref. 47, beslutsagent","abstract":["Vad som hände: Beslutet har således ansetts kompetensenligt oavsett att lagen om kommunala åtgärder till bostadsförsörjningens främjande är upphävd.","Vad domstolen sa: Ett beslut av kommunfullmäktige att teckna borgen för en kommunal bostadsstiftelse har ansetts falla inom ramen för kommunens allmänna kompetens enligt kommunallagen.","Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 1997."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-47","softwareVersion":"fef7504bdfa011fb","citation":"avgorande-ra-1997-47, RÅ 1997 ref. 47, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-47 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:cdd768de01f70ce1, bygge legal-2026-09-26).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1997-47/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:f896e1de662c4849eb48ad58fb3f836debfca04482b55da15478f20a60d76c32","version":"legal-2026-09-26","expires":"2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-26+legal-2026-09-26+2026-09-26T06:41:33","content_hash":"sha256:f896e1de662c4849eb48ad58fb3f836debfca04482b55da15478f20a60d76c32","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T07:57:36.704Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-47","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1997-47/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}