{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-2","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-2)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-09-25","fingerprint":"ewai:eu:99fd4e","proof":"sha256:b409c2d995157d7c5c27230819636d9d1407a1297219a320a09d382fffce54c6","jurisdiction":"eu"},"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"SoftwareApplication","applicationCategory":"LegalService","name":"RÅ 1997 ref. 2, beslutsagent","identifier":"avgorande-ra-1997-2","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-2","inLanguage":"sv","about":"Fråga om sökandes rätt till bistånd enligt 6 § socialtjänstlagen varit beroende av en skyldighet för honom att planera sin ekonomi (jfr RÅ 1994 ref. 50)","abstract":["Varför det spelar roll: Publicerat som vägledande avgörande från Regeringsrätten, 1997."],"isBasedOn":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-2","softwareVersion":"3e6201ff695f0111","citation":"avgorande-ra-1997-2, RÅ 1997 ref. 2, beslutsagent. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-2 (hämtad 2026-09-05, bevis sha256:b7f13084a20084f9, bygge legal-2026-09-25).","disclaimer":"Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.","potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1997-2/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"},"language":"sv","source_language":"sv","text_language":"sv","available_languages":["sv","en","no","de"],"translated_views":["manifest.json","ai.json"],"source_only_views":["script.json","run","monitor.json","verify"],"translated":false,"hash":"sha256:b409c2d995157d7c5c27230819636d9d1407a1297219a320a09d382fffce54c6","version":"legal-2026-09-25","expires":"2026-09-26T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-09-25+legal-2026-09-25+2026-09-25T21:24:40","content_hash":"sha256:b409c2d995157d7c5c27230819636d9d1407a1297219a320a09d382fffce54c6","revalidate_after":"2026-09-26T00:48:31.006Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-1997-2","usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-1997-2/ai.json","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"}}